![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/tx.gif)
![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/menushadowbottom.PNG)
|
|
USER COMMENTS BY THE CURE |
|
|
| RECENTLY-COMMENTED SERMONS | More | Last Post | Total |
· Page 1 · Found: 123 user comments posted recently. |
| ![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/btn_next4.gif) |
|
|
3/24/09 5:31 PM |
The Cure | | ![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/gray2.gif) | ![Find all comments by The Cure](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/magnifier.gif) |
|
Add new comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Reply to comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Report abuse
|
Sickened wrote: The Cure - We can question each other's conversions if we see serious error, but NOT if we disagree with them over the doctrine of Calvinism, a person's views on election have NO bearing whatsoever on whether or not they are saved. If it was JUST election then I take your point. But invariably the doctrine of election is connected to a variety of other positions. A case in point is the Synod of Dordt against the Remonstrance of the Arminians. Clearly all are interconnected and one doctrine identifies other beliefs which lead to the conviction of others. None are totally independant on both sides of the divide. |
|
|
3/24/09 3:35 PM |
The Cure | | ![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/gray2.gif) | ![Find all comments by The Cure](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/magnifier.gif) |
|
Add new comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Reply to comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Report abuse
|
Sickened wrote: The sheer arrogance and unChristian attitudes on display on this comment board are disgusting. How dare we question each other's conversions? Shame upon you all. Jesus did.Matt 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. 22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? 23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity. Then theres...... 2John v10 If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: 11 For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds. So it is Biblical to question and may prove helpful if the person is in error. |
|
|
2/28/08 6:37 PM |
The Cure | | To Calvinism Cancer | | ![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/gray2.gif) | ![Go to homepage](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/small_house6.gif) | ![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/gray2.gif) | ![Find all comments by The Cure](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/magnifier.gif) |
|
Add new comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Reply to comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Report abuse
|
Chaos is a systematic theology like Covenant Theology that interprets prophecies as Jesus ruling over the spiritual kingdom as if he did not rule the Kingdom of Heaven before his resurrection.Now that's chaos! 1. You have prophecies that are really no prophecies at all. 2. You have King David, a mere man, as the predecessor of the Spiritual Kingdom. 3. The promises given to national Israel is nothing more than the biggest sham in the history of the universe. That's what happens when you preferr a theology solely based on humanistic inferences, rather than one who believes that God means what he states and states what he means. |
|
|
2/27/08 10:50 AM |
The Cure | | To Calvinism Cancer | | ![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/gray2.gif) | ![Find all comments by The Cure](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/magnifier.gif) |
|
Add new comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Reply to comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Report abuse
|
Icon O'Clast wrote: You must be proud of your ignorance Cure, you show it off so much. Ritual purification has nothing to do with washing your hands before a meal. You can be fresh out of a bath and not ceremonially clean. Read the OT purification laws. Then read other posts properly and take the time to check what people say, including the Bible texts, before you blurt out the first thing that comes out of your scone. SO now there is a practical difference between ritual washings and all other kinds of washings?Ha! Let me guess, you are going to give me a Bible text that clearly states that washing is nothing more than a sprinkle. Some how I seriously doubt that that is going to happen. Until then I'll take your exhortation as another hypocritical pontification called the Calvinist one-way street. |
|
|
2/26/08 11:59 PM |
The Cure | | To Calvinism Cancer | | ![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/gray2.gif) | ![Go to homepage](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/small_house6.gif) | ![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/gray2.gif) | ![Find all comments by The Cure](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/magnifier.gif) |
|
Add new comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Reply to comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Report abuse
|
Ha!Listen, son, if it stated that he took hyssop and baptized his tent with it, then you may have an argument. But it does not. Can you get that through your head? You can't simply state that sprinkling means baptism for no other reason other than because you want to. You have to have some linguistical proof. Concerning washings, I agree. That's because they are virtually the same thing. When one washes his hands, he must immerse them in water. When one washes the dishes, he must immerse it in water. When one washes his body, one must immerse it in water. You get the picture? If that does not work, then try this... Go to your mother's house, and spray your hands with a little water before dinner (with her watching), and tell her that you have just finished washing your hands. Maybe when she smacks you across the face for your ignorance, you will start to understand where I am coming from. I hope that helps. |
|
|
2/23/08 10:52 PM |
The Cure | | To Calvinism Cancer | | ![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/gray2.gif) | ![Go to homepage](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/small_house6.gif) | ![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/gray2.gif) | ![Find all comments by The Cure](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/magnifier.gif) |
|
Add new comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Reply to comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Report abuse
|
DJC49 wrote: Mr. Cure: You err. Christ is NOT the type, but the antitype. He is the fulfillment of the typology. Ok you ignore all the times I used the term correctly, and you choke on the one time I made a mistake.You must be a Calvinist. Christ eternality has nothing to do with prophecy. Though God is indeed eternal, he chooses to act within the realm of time. Just because he decides to do so does not rob him of his eternality. What you are proposing is called a red-herring. What you do not realize is that if prophecy cannot be taken literally simply because God is eternal you fall into the following error: 1. There is NO prophecy that can be taken literally, both the ones that have been fullfilled and the ones that are to be fulfilled. We have no reason to believe that Jesus literally came the first time. According to your hermeneutic, that would be impossible since God is eternal. You can't even (erroneously) presume that some prophecy has been fulfilled in AD 70. In fact, forget about the millenium, Jesus is not coming back in any form! I need more room for my second and concluding point. |
|
|
2/23/08 3:19 PM |
The Cure | | To Calvinism Cancer | | ![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/gray2.gif) | ![Find all comments by The Cure](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/magnifier.gif) |
|
Add new comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Reply to comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Report abuse
|
Like I said, Covenant Theology, was created for no other reason but to keep the modified version of baptismal regeneration called paedobaptism.The Bible is very clear that a profession of faith is required for baptism. When the Ethiopian eunuch asked for the requirments for salvation, Phillip told him very clearly that he had to believe with his whole heart. Acts 8:36-38 wrote: 36And as they went on their way, they came unto a certain water: and the eunuch said, See, here is water; what doth hinder me to be baptized? 37And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. 38And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and they went down both into the water, both Philip and the eunuch; and he baptized him. |
|
|
|
Jump to Page : [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
| ![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/btn_next4.gif) |
|
|
|
|
![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/tx.gif)
|
![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/tx.gif)
|