[URL=http://www.desiringgod.org/ResourceLibrary/Articles/ByDate/2004/1534_Good_English_With_Minimal_Translation_Why_Bethlehem_Uses_the_ESV/]]]see Piper abandoning the NASB[/URL] The NASB is not as good as the ESV is it, see John Piper on why the ESV should be the stndard version for the church and why he abandoned the NASB.
Not if some evangelicals are seeking a ONE BIBLE VERSION AUTHORITY should NASB users be moving from that version? Or are they NASB only
The ESV represents a new level of excellence in Bible translations—"
Dr. R. Albert Mohler,
Then again J I Packer is General Editor of the ESV and he has just revised one of his books
[URL=http://www.takeheed.net/Take_Heed_2010/Current_Concerns/Jan_2010/Packer_and_Mother_Teresa.htm]]]Trusting Revisionists[/URL]
So should I follow Packer then Sproul and Piper and Mohler as my authority on which tie to chose, as it seems to be all about personal preference? Rather than accuracy.
Strange that the NIV went out of fashion as a bad translation, even stranger it was ever in fashion ![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/smilies/what.gif)
Who do you trust?